Wednesday, April 10, 2019

Finding God’s Name and the Trinity in the OT and NT


Just by looking at the title to this post, on the surface this may not seem to be that important of a discussion to many – an “oh we already know this stuff” type of thing. But nothing could be farther from the truth. Seeing as there are theists from all walks of religions, atheists, and those in between, it's easily understood there are just as many personal, subjective opinions about the word “God” as there are people in the world. According to a 2018 report by the Pew Research Center, 56% of Americans believe specifically in the God of the Bible. And of those 56%, the word “God” today has come to mean so many different things to the point that we are all guilty of subjectively creating at least somewhat of an idol in our minds.

That fact alone should warrant an investigation into this important topic. This is a crucial discussion because it’s assumed we’re all talking about the same God when, in fact, we’re not at all. Due to this ambiguity among Christians, the result is a poor relationship with God. After all, how can you get to know someone and love someone without truly knowing who they are? “What comes into our minds when we think about God is the most important thing about us” so says A.W. Tozer in his classic book The Knowledge of the Holy.

On the one extreme, you have people who believe God is very authoritarian, frowns at our unholiness at any given time, and is so absent that He rarely butts in to lend a hand in our lives, thus causing these people to feel constant guilt and like God doesn't care about them personally. On the other extreme, you have people who believe God is so into their lives that He doesn't at all think their sin is bad and is just there to bless them and help them to have stuff and to be happy, thus causing these types of people to show little guilt because they think God perpetually affirms their life decisions.

With that said, using the Old Testament and New Testament alike, Who exactly is this “God” that the Bible speaks of? Does He have a name? What are His characteristics? And why do we refer to Him as a . . . Him?

Introduction to the Trinity
Starting from the beginning, we see in the very first chapter and verse: “In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth” (Genesis 1:1). This verse is so ripe with information that we will have to continue coming back to it. For the time being, in order to see exactly who is involved in the creation event (Genesis 1:1-3, 26-27 in particular), one of the many things can learn is that, if we translate the word “God” in the original language that Genesis was written (Hebrew), we see that “Elohim” simply means God is a title instead of an identifying name (similar to how we say “dad” or “mom”). While that doesn’t seem to help us much, the next thing we see is that the noun “Elohim” is grammatically plural (the -im suffix in Hebrew indicates plural form, whereas the singular form would either be “Eloah” or even just “El”).

This does not mean the Bible is suggesting polytheism (that there is more than one God). Rather, the fact that there is only one God is highlighted in Deuteronomy 6:4 (“Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one!”), in Malachi 2:10 (“Have we not all one Father? Has not one God created us?”), and all throughout both the Old Testament and the New Testament alike. In fact, three times in Isaiah 45 alone, for instance, God clearly says, “I am the LORD, and there is no other; there is no God besides Me” (Isaiah 45: 5-18). Rather, this plurality has to do with His majesty.

In verse two we read, “The earth was formless and empty, and darkness covered the deep waters. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the surface of the waters.” Note that this verse doesn't just say “God” again but specifically “the spirit” of God. Then, jumping to verse 26 we see the words “us” and “our” in reference to His creation: ‘“Then God said, “Let us make man in our image, in our likeness, and let them rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock, over all the earth, and over all the creatures that move along the ground.”’ Also in 3:22: ‘“And the LORD God said, “The man has now become like one of us.”’

So, was the plurality in verse one speaking of just God and His spirit, or is there more to that equation? This is a significant question that we will have to put to the side for the time being.

It’s All in the Name
To find both the very name of God and also the meaning behind that specific name, we have to skip ahead to chapter three of the book of Exodus. We see in verse two the word “LORD” is in all capital letters: “And the angel of the LORD appeared to him in a flame of fire out of the midst of a bush. He looked, and behold, the bush was burning, yet it was not consumed.” While this isn’t the first time we see this in Scripture, it is where we find the reasoning for it. “LORD” is what the English translators put it in place of God's divine name.

Continuing from verse six to verse 15, God speaks to Moses about the Israelites: ‘“I am the God of your father, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob.” And Moses hid his face, for he was afraid to look at God. Then the LORD said, “I have surely seen the affliction of my people who are in Egypt and have heard their cry because of their taskmasters. I know their sufferings, and I have come down to deliver them out of the hand of the Egyptians and to bring them up out of that land to a good and broad land, a land flowing with milk and honey, to the place of the Canaanites, the Hittites, the Amorites, the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites. And now, behold, the cry of the people of Israel has come to me, and I have also seen the oppression with which the Egyptians oppress them. Come, I will send you to Pharaoh that you may bring my people, the children of Israel, out of Egypt.” But Moses said to God, “Who am I that I should go to Pharaoh and bring the children of Israel out of Egypt?” God answered, “I will be with you. And this is your sign that I am the one who has sent you: When you have brought the people out of Egypt, you will worship God at this very mountain.” Then Moses said to God, “If I come to the people of Israel and say to them, ‘The God of your fathers has sent me to you,’ and they ask me, ‘What is his name?’ what shall I say to them?” God said to Moses, “I AM WHO I AM. This is what you are to say to the Israelites: 'I AM has sent me to you.” God also said to Moses, “Say this to the people of Israel: ‘The LORD, the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has sent me to you.’ This is my name forever, and thus I am to be remembered throughout all generations.”’

We see that in verse 12 God said to Moses “I will be with you.” And how one would say “I will be” in Hebrew was “Ehweh.” This does not mean God will be with Moses at a later time but, rather, that God is already with and will always be with him. God then answers Moses' question in verse 13 of what His name is with the reply, “I AM WHO I AM.” This the Hebrew word “Yahweh.” When God refers to Himself He says Ehweh, but when others refer to Him it is Yahweh. Though God’s name, Yahweh, sounds like He is trying to say something philosophical, He is simply revealing His character while giving His name at the same time. The significance of this name is that it is a deeply personal statement from God revealing to us Who He is. In other words: I will forever continue to be Who I am. (When Moses is to tell the Israelites Yahweh is with them, it is saying “HE IS is with us”). Thus, whatever characteristics God displays, He is that. So if God displays mercy, love, justice, etc., He is the very, perfect, reliable, never-changing embodiment and definition of those very things. And we have already seen in verse 12 something God is: always with us. He is what He is, and what He is is with us - always and forever.

Back to the Trinity
To get back to where we left off in Genesis 1, we must jump ahead to quick examples in the books of Psalms, Micah, Isaiah, and Daniel.

First, in the book of Psalms: “The stone that the builders rejected has become the cornerstone. This is the LORD’s doing; it is marvelous in our eyes” (118:22-23).

In the book of Micah: “But you, O Bethlehem Ephrathah, who are too little to be among the clans of Judah, from you shall come forth for me one who is to be ruler in Israel, whose coming forth is from of old, from ancient days” (5:2).

In the book of Isaiah: “Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign. Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel” (7:14).

Then the eyes of the blind shall be opened, and the ears of the deaf unstopped; then shall the lame man leap like a deer, and the tongue of the mute sing for joy” (35:5-6).

See, my servant will prosper; he will be highly exalted. But many were amazed when they saw him. His face was so disfigured he seemed hardly human, and from his appearance, one would scarcely know he was a man. And he will startle many nations. Kings will stand speechless in his presence. For they will see what they had not been told; they will understand what they had not heard about. . . . He grew up before him like a young plant, and like a root out of dry ground; he had no form or majesty that we should look at him, and no beauty that we should desire him. He was despised and rejected by men, a man of sorrows and acquainted with grief; and as one from whom men hide their faces he was despised, and we esteemed him not. Surely he has borne our griefs and carried our sorrows; yet we esteemed him stricken, smitten by God, and afflicted. But he was pierced for our transgressions; he was crushed for our iniquities; upon him was the chastisement that brought us peace, and with his wounds we are healed. All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned—every one—to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all. He was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he opened not his mouth; like a lamb that is led to the slaughter, and like a sheep that before its shearers is silent, so he opened not his mouth. By oppression and judgment he was taken away. . . . And they made his grave with the wicked and with a rich man in his death, although he had done no violence, and there was no deceit in his mouth. Yet it was the will of the LORD to crush him; he has put him to grief; when his soul makes an offering for guilt, he shall see his offspring; he shall prolong his days; the will of the LORD shall prosper in his hand. Out of the anguish of his soul he shall see and be satisfied; by his knowledge shall the righteous one, my servant, make many to be accounted righteous, and he shall bear their iniquities. Therefore I will divide him a portion with the many, and he shall divide the spoil with the strong, because he poured out his soul to death and was numbered with the transgressors; yet he bore the sin of many, and makes intercession for the transgressors” (52:13-53:2-12).

And in the book of Daniel: ““I saw in the night visions, and behold, with the clouds of heaven there came one like a son of man, and he came to the Ancient of Days and was presented before him. And to him was given dominion and glory and a kingdom, that all peoples, nations, and languages should serve him; his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom one that shall not be destroyed” (Daniel 7:13-14).

Who exactly was this “son of man?” The fulfillment of each of these prophecies (and over 300more) is found at the very onset of the New Testament.

“Son of man” is a title that simply means a son of a human being. Though, when matched with prophecy, we see that this “son” wasn’t just born from a woman but from a woman who was a virgin.

‘“The birth of Jesus Christ took place in this way. When his mother Mary had been betrothed to Joseph, before they came together she was found to be with child from the Holy Spirit. And her husband Joseph, being a just man and unwilling to put her to shame, resolved to divorce her quietly. But as he considered these things, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying, “Joseph, son of David, do not fear to take Mary as your wife, for that which is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. She will bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins.” All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had spoken by the prophet: “Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and they shall call his name Immanuel” (which means, God with us). When Joseph woke from sleep, he did as the angel of the Lord commanded him: he took his wife, but knew her not until she had given birth to a son. And he called his name Jesus”’ (Matthew 1:18-25).

This birth did not just happen anywhere, but happened in Bethlehem exactly as was prophesied: ‘“Now after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold, wise men from the east came to Jerusalem, saying, “Where is he who has been born king of the Jews? For we saw his star when it rose and have come to worship him.” When Herod the king heard this, he was troubled, and all Jerusalem with him; and assembling all the chief priests and scribes of the people, he inquired of them where the Christ was to be born. They told him, “In Bethlehem of Judea, for so it is written by the prophet: “And you, O Bethlehem, in the land of Judah, are by no means least among the rulers of Judah; for from you shall come a ruler who will shepherd my people Israel”’ (Matthew 2:1-5).

“Has not the Scripture said that the Christ comes from the offspring of David, and comes from Bethlehem, the village where David was” (John 7:42)?

Jesus is the Son of man (He described Himself as such 81 times), was born of a virgin in Bethlehem, and would fulfill the prophecy of having and using the power to perform miracles: “And Jesus answered them, “Go and tell John what you hear and see: the blind receive their sight and the lame walk, lepers are cleansed and the deaf hear, and the dead are raised up, and the poor have good news preached to them” (Matthew 11:4-5).

Furthermore, Jesus was rejected by man. He reminded people of Who He was with this prophecy: ‘“Jesus said to them, “Have you never read in the Scriptures: ‘The stone that the builders rejected has become the cornerstone; this was the Lord’s doing, and it is marvelous in our eyes”’ (Matthew 21:42)?

Jesus was then tortured to the point that He was unrecognizable. The ancient historian Eusebius gives a personal account of the wicked torture of scourging: “The bystanders were struck with amazement when they saw them lacerated with scourges even to the innermost veins and arteries, so that the hidden inward parts of the body, both their bowels and their members, were exposed to view.” The victim of Roman scourging would have been so weak from blood loss and internal damage that they would die more quickly, of course, than if they had not been scourged. In fact, had someone been only scourged and not killed in another way afterward, they would most likely die from massive blood loss as a result. Sadly the worst had yet to come for Jesus, as He was then murdered in such a horrendous way that a new word (“excruciating”) had to be invented.

Finally, of course, we have ample evidence that He defeated death, was resurrected from the grave, ascended to the right hand of God in Heaven, and now forgives the sins for those who put their trust in Him.

With all of that said, this “son of man” sure sounds like God. And you’d be right; that’s exactly Who He is! Working our way back to Genesis 1, we arrive first at where we discussed in Exodus 3:2-15 of Moses learning God’s name. Jesus echoes this name, and it almost gets Him stoned to death!
To the question from the Pharisees, ‘“Are you greater than our father Abraham? He died, and so did the prophets. Who do you think you are?” Jesus replies, “If I glorify myself, my glory is nothing. It is my Father who glorifies me, of whom you say, ‘He is our God.’ But you have not known him. I know him. If I were to say that I do not know him, I would be a liar like you, but I do know him and I keep his word. Your father Abraham rejoiced that he would see my day. He saw it and was glad.” The people listening in to this conversation then said, “You aren't even fifty years old. How can you say you have seen Abraham?” To this, Jesus replied, “Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am.” At this, they picked up stones to stone him, but Jesus hid himself, slipping away from the temple grounds”’ (John 8:53-59).

If Jesus merely wanting to convey that He somehow lived before the time of Abraham, He would have said, “Before Abraham was, I was.” Jesus knew what He was saying, and so did those who became mad enough from His statement that they tried to murder Him with stones. Jesus states here that He is not just the son of man that was prophesied, nor is He just a servant of God. Rather, He says He is God – the great I AM (Yahweh) – Who is worthy of worship that is reserved only for God! And this makes perfect sense from the prophecy in Isaiah (fulfilled in Matthew) that this individual’s name and very nature would be “God with us.”

The disciple, Thomas, for instance, said of Jesus upon seeing Him risen from the grave, “My Lord and my God” (John 20:28)! The Apostle Paul would declare to the church in Corinth, “There is one God, the Father, from whom are all things and for whom we exist, and one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom are all things and through whom we exist” (1 Corinthians 8:6).

Unlike the Hebrew Old Testament, because the New Testament was written in Greek and the New Testament writers predominantly used a Greek translation of the Old Testament (called The Septuagint) which never uses all capital letters when referring to God, the word “Lord” is never in all capital letters. Rather, when we see the word written “Lord” in reference to God in the New Testament, we know that “Yahweh” is being discussed. So, what is being done here is stating Jesus is Yahweh.

Working our way back even closer to Genesis 1, we come to Jesus’ baptism, at about the age of 30, by the hand of John the Baptist (the baptizer) in the book of Matthew: ‘“In those days John the Baptist came preaching in the wilderness of Judea, “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.” For this is he who was spoken of by the prophet Isaiah when he said, “The voice of one crying in the wilderness: ‘Prepare the way of the Lord; make his paths straight.’ . . . I baptize you with water for repentance, but he who is coming after me is mightier than I, whose sandals I am not worthy to carry. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire.” . . . Then Jesus came from Galilee to the Jordan to John, to be baptized by him. But John tried to prevent him, saying, “I need to be baptized by you, and do you come to me?” But Jesus answered him, “Let it be so now, for thus it is fitting for us to fulfill all righteousness.” Then he consented. And when Jesus was baptized, immediately he went up from the water, and behold, the heavens were opened to him, and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove and coming to rest on him; and behold, a voice from heaven said, “This is my beloved Son, with whom I am well pleased”’ (3:1-3,11,13-17).

First thing, yes this was a fulfilled prophecy from Isaiah: ‘“A voice cries: “In the wilderness prepare the way of the LORD; make straight in the desert a highway for our God”’ (40:3). Second, notice that this prophecy speaks of Yahweh (“LORD”). So, a messenger was prophesied. This was John the Baptist. And this messenger was to prepare the way for Yahweh. John the Baptist prepared the way for Jesus. Thus, Jesus is clearly being equated with Yahweh!

Third, when the spirit takes the form of a dove hovering over the waters, does that sound familiar? Right, we saw in the spirit hovering over the waters at the creation event in Genesis 1:2. Fourth, an interesting note is that this was a dramatic event. In the Gospel of Mark, speaking of this moment, the word “schizo,” which means to split or tear, is used (used only one other time, when the temple was dramatically split from top to bottom at the very moment Jesus died on the cross). So, the heavens split and tore open, being a direct reference to the cries of the people heard in Isaiah: “If only You would tear the heavens open and come down, so that mountains would quake at Your presence” (64:1).

“Tried to prevent Him”? Why would John do that?

The gospel of John adds, “The next day he saw Jesus coming toward him, and said, ‘“The next day John [the Baptist] saw Jesus coming toward him and said, “Here is the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world! This is the One I told you about: ‘After me comes a man who has surpassed me, because He existed before me’” (1:29-30).

“Existed before me”? John the Baptist was born before Jesus (his own cousin). So what is that all about?

Finally, we see John the apostle write, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made. In him was life, and the life was the light of men. The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it. The true light, which gives light to everyone, was coming into the world. He was in the world, and the world was made through him, yet the world did not know him. He came to his own, and his own people did not receive him. But to all who did receive him, who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God, who were born, not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God. And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth.” (1:1-5, 9-14).

Compiling this information together with what else we have discussed, we find that John the Baptist tried to prevent Jesus from being baptized, because why would the Son of God, the One Who would live a sinless life, the One Who would forgive sin, Who not only was there “in the beginning” but was the One through which the universe was created (Colossians 1:15-20, 2 Timothy 1:9, and Jude 1:25, for example, also speaks of this) need repentance Himself? God’s voice and Spirit, and the resurrection that would take place later on (Romans 1:4, for example, also speaks of this), all put a visual and audible mark of approval on Jesus to have full authority (to forgive sins, to heal the sick, to raise the dead, to cast out demons, and so on), as God in the flesh Who dwelt among us. Yes, Jesus acted and spoke as if He was God because, in fact, He was fully God and fully human at the same time, in order to give Himself as the only sacrifice that would work to redeem us and to make salvation possible: “these are written so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name” (John 20:31).

For Jesus to have called Himself as the great I AM, and called Son by God the Father means in all of those instances that He is one in essence, that He is co-equal, that He is the exact representation of God the Father’s nature. The Holy Spirit also shares this unified nature with God the Father and God the Son. Thus, we have found that, yes there was more to the equation to the plurality in Genesis 1. Before the creation event, God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit have all eternally existed as one God in a plurality of personalities. Jesus Christ – the Word of God, as described by John – is the final piece of what is called the Trinity. As the Apostle Paul sums up the Trinity while in prayer: “The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ and the love of God and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit be with you all” (2 Corinthians 13:14).

The Old Testament implicitly hints at this plurality of God, and the New Testament clarifies it. Thus, both Genesis 1:26 and 3:22 represents a conversation within the Trinity; God the Father is having a “conversation” with God the Son and God the Holy Spirit. Jesus Himself spoke of God the Father as being a distinct Person from Him, yet the same God. Jesus also spoke of God being a Person distinct from Him and the Father, yet the same God: The Holy Spirit. Does that sound pretty cool? Absolutely. Does that sound pretty confusing? Absolutely. The Trinity lies at the very heart of the Christian faith, yet that doesn’t mean we as Christians fully understand, are supposed to fully understand it, or even have the ability and capacity to understand it. But God has given us enough information to know He has existed and will forever exist in this way.

Further, Scripture is clear that we can know the plurality of three personalities in the Trinity does not equate to what is called “modalism” (God acting in three modes). In other words, the God of the Bible does not simply put on different hats for different jobs. (You can imagine a town of 100 people having one individual being, say, the postman, the owner of the gas station, and the justice of the peace. Or imagine a theater production with a limited cast forcing a person to hurry and change their costumes in order to play multiple roles). Since Scripture clearly shows the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit all having their differing, simultaneous, co-equal, co-eternal roles, it fully takes away the possibility of God having “three hats.” Thus, to use common analogies of God being like an egg having three parts or water having three states does not work.

We learn so much about the first coming of Jesus. Now, we must prepare for His second coming. “Long ago, at many times and in many ways, God spoke to our fathers by the prophets, but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son” (Hebrews 1:1-2). At that time, He will be “clothed in a robe dipped in blood, and the name by which he is called is The Word of God” (Revelation 19:13).


Friday, April 5, 2019

What Does Scripture and Science Say About Alcohol?


Before we begin with such a touchy topic, let us first state that this is simply the first of a number of posts that will deal with sins which are so fitting to our lifestyles that we simply sweep them under the rug. Thus, other touchy topics will have their day to shine; just not today. Further, a group of Christians or one should not play collective conscience. That imposes our beliefs on others which can cause us to seem potentially overly self righteous. But we as believers and as human beings in general have every right to allow wisdom and warning to hold hands.

Thinking on the sins we commit each day, wouldn’t you agree that there are some things in your life or in the life of someone you know which are viewed as “sins” in quotation marks? For instance, so many of us would not call eating too much a “sin.” Gossip, too, isn’t a “sin.” Then there’s sexual promiscuity, self-righteousness, lying, pride, and so on. The fact is that there are some things we just don’t take very seriously in comparison to others.

We oftentimes trick ourselves into believing that it’s the “real bad” sins we have to avoid – like being Hitler – all while we totally ignore the “small” sins in our lives and disregard that all sin actually is real bad in God’s eyes. The reality is that all sin needs to be confessed and eliminated, no matter what we may think of it. All sin separates us from Christ, with some of these swept-under-the-rug “sins” having a heightened ability to lead us farther and farther from Him.

Specifically today I want us to discuss something that causes more misunderstood opinions than any in regards to sin. This topic has destroyed people’s lives near and dear to me, with both their walks with God’s and their even being on Earth anymore. That topic which is oftentimes swept right under the rug: alcohol.

First of all, is alcohol a sin?

“Well, I only have a beer every once in a while.”

No, I asked was it a sin.

“Well, it might add to the flavor of my food. So, I think it’s ok to have a couple glasses.”

Still waiting.

“Well, the Bible says we shouldn’t get drunk.”

True, but that’s not far enough. Let me help out. If I said “Well, I lie sometimes, but I’m no Hitler,” would those lies still be sins? If I said “Well, but I didn’t want to lie because it would have made things awkward,” would that lie still be a sin? Of course, to both.

So let’s get the frequency of alcohol out of the way: a couple sips or a couple truckloads both could very well be sins. So what exactly does the Bible say about the matter?


Drunkenness (Including Being “Buzzed” or “Tipsy”)
Exodus 32:4-7, 10 – ‘“Then Aaron took the gold, melted it down, and molded it into the shape of a calf. When the people saw it, they exclaimed, "O Israel, these are the gods who brought you out of the land of Egypt!" When Aaron saw this, he built an altar before it. And Aaron made a proclamation and said, “Tomorrow shall be a feast to the LORD.” Early the next morning they brought some animals to burn as sacrifices and others to eat as fellowship offerings. The people sat down to a feast, which turned into an orgy of drinking and sex. And the LORD said to Moses, “Go down, for your people, whom you brought up out of the land of Egypt, have corrupted themselves. . . . Now therefore let me alone, that my wrath may burn hot against them and I may consume them.”’

1 Corinthians 6:9-11 – “Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.”

Ephesians 5:18 – “And do not get drunk with wine, for that is debauchery.”

Romans 13:13 – “Let us walk properly as in the daytime, not in orgies and drunkenness, not in sexual immorality and sensuality, not in quarreling and jealousy.”

Habakkuk 2:15 – “Woe to him who makes his neighbors drink – you pour out your wrath and make them drunk, in order to gaze at their nakedness!”

Proverbs 23:10, 21, 29-35 – “Don't associate with those who drink too much wine or with those who gorge themselves on meat. . . . For the drunkard and the glutton will come to poverty, and slumber will clothe them with rags. . . . Who has woe? Who has sorrow? Who has strife? Who has complaining? Who has wounds without cause? Who has redness of eyes? Those who tarry long over wine; those who go to try mixed wine. Do not look at wine when it is red, when it sparkles in the cup and goes down smoothly. In the end it bites like a serpent and stings like an adder. Your eyes will see strange things, and your heart utter perverse things.”

Isaiah 28:7-8 – “Now, however, Israel is led by drunks who reel with wine and stagger with alcohol. The priests and prophets stagger with alcohol and lose themselves in wine. They reel when they see visions and stagger as they render decisions. Their tables are covered with vomit; filth is everywhere.”

Galatians 5:19-21 – “Now the works of the flesh are evident: sexual immorality, impurity, sensuality, idolatry, sorcery, enmity, strife, jealousy, fits of anger, rivalries, dissensions, divisions, envy, drunkenness, orgies, and things like these. I warn you, as I warned you before, that those who do such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.”

Luke 21:34 – “But watch yourselves lest your hearts be weighed down with dissipation and drunkenness.”

1 Peter 4:3 – “For there has already been enough time spent in doing what the pagans choose to do: carrying on in unrestrained behavior, evil desires, drunkenness, orgies, carousing, and lawless idolatry.” (We will revisit this particular verse later on).

And so on and so on.

Before alcohol affects your central nervous system and deteriorates motor skills, it affects our inhibitions and silences the conscience. As our moral restraints become blurred at the same rate as our neural reflexes (reaction time and decision making), you set yourself up to become free to multiple avenues of sins. Many, many examples in Scripture where it speaks of drinking (and not even drunkenness in most instances), clothes came off, rape happened, incest happened, affairs happened, murders happened, murders were covered up, leaders had poor judgment skills and kingdoms were quickly overthrown, etc. Alcohol changes your personality and makes you less morally strong.

Okay so that is an obvious, cut and dry topic. What, then, does Scripture say about types of alcoholic drinks?


Strong Drink
Proverbs 20:1 – “Wine is a mocker, strong drink a brawler, and whoever is led astray by it is not wise.”

Proverbs 31:4 – “It is not for kings, O Lemuel, it is not for kings to drink wine; nor for princes strong drink.”

Isaiah 5:11, 22 – “Woe to those who rise early in the morning, that they may run after strong drink, who tarry late into the evening as wine inflames them! . . . Woe to those who are heroes at drinking wine, and valiant men in mixing strong drink.”

Isaiah 28:7 – “These also reel with wine and stagger with strong drink; the priest and the prophet reel with strong drink, they are swallowed by wine, they stagger with strong drink, they reel in vision, they stumble in giving judgment.”

Isaiah 56:9-12 – ‘“All you beasts of the field, come to devour— all you beasts in the forest. Israel’s watchmen are blind; they are all without knowledge; they are all silent dogs; they cannot bark, dreaming, lying down, loving to slumber. The dogs have a mighty appetite; they never have enough. But they are shepherds who have no understanding; they have all turned to their own way, each to his own gain, one and all. “Come,” they say, “let me get wine; let us fill ourselves with strong drink; and tomorrow will be like this day, great beyond measure.”’

It’s obvious that having a strong drink is Scripturally bad. But let’s dig into those two words as see what was meant by “strong drink.”

Looking at weed as a means to make a point, the level of THC (tetrahydrocannabinol, the main active ingredient) is so much more potent (at least 4 times as potent) in marijuana today than in the past. Further, cannabis extracts can be over 20 times as potent. There are many people who are perfectly fine with alcoholic consumption but will be against the use of weed because it is many times more potent than in any time in history. The interesting thing is that modern-day alcohol is also significantly stronger than any time in history – especially its Biblical counterpart – and, thus, even today’s wine would be considered “strong drink” using Biblical categories.

The average wine today is usually 12-16% (not fortified wine, as that can range up to 34%), but labels can be misleading and percentages can actually be nearly two percent higher than stated. Red wine has more alcoholic content (usually an additional three percent) compared to white wine. And liquor is usually between 35% and 60% but can be as high as 96%. What, then, was wine like in ancient times?

The strength of this wine was not comparable to modern-day wine. In regards to the alcoholic content, it was much lower. Because yeast was not resilient, it would be killed and the fermentation process would cease when the percentage reached 10%. So, because it was actually impossible to have a wine stronger than this, it is undeniable that the percentage of alcohol in wine was never exceeded 10%. Of course, wine was not always right under 10%, as it was commonly much weaker than that even before being diluted with water. Barley “beer” existed, but its content was no higher than 4% (craft beer today is much higher). It also did not mean hard liquor, as it was an unknown in antiquity. Wine at this percentage was easily the most intoxicating beverage in antiquity. Thus, drinking this wine straight, which is quite weaker than today’s common table wine, was referred to as “strong drink.”

If we fast-forward in time, distillation (a process that results in higher alcohol concentrations) was not in use until roughly 1,200 years after Jesus lived on Earth (and even then distillation was a tool used strictly for medicinal purposes). Further, we had not found a way to make the content of wine higher than 13.5% until the 1950’s. Today, wine is more potent because it is made with sulfur dioxide and much more resistant, very genetically modified yeast.

There were a number of reasons that caused the water to be infected with disease and to be barely drinkable. In order to combat the water-borne pathogens, water was oftentimes purified by being mixed with alcoholic wine. So, even with a much lower content of alcohol compared to modern-day wine, wine was then diluted even more with water. Thus, mixing wine with water not only significantly diluted the alcohol content but it also purified the water. When we search the historical record to see how much this already weaker wine was diluted, we see that Homer’s Odyssey gives a ratio of twenty parts water to one part wine, Pliny the Elder gives a ratio of eight parts water to one part wine, and Athenaeus gives a ratio of three parts water to one part wine. Drinking undiluted wine was considered “barbaric.” As Plutarch stated, ‘”We call a mixture “wine” although the larger of the components is water.”’

With a 3-to-1 ratio, it’s been stated one would have to drink over 11 glasses of wine in order to equal the amount of alcohol in one martini today (the average martini has 3 ounces, or a quarter the amount of a Coke). And that 3-to-1 ratio is the most potent mixture found in the historical record (again, others being 8-to-1 and 20-to-1).

There wasn’t soda or coffee to quench thirst; and who wants to drink goat’s milk on a hot day (sorry, I had to throw up, but I’m back now)? Since water was largely undrinkable, wine being mixed with water was seen as a perfectly common daily staple and was not viewed as something used to escape reality. It also would have added a sweetened flavor to water. Further, this mixing of wine and water was also a good way to make the wine go further, as there were only so many grapes at harvest to last everyone all year!


Wine
Focusing on wine in particular, if it was barbaric to drink straight wine, and is flat out sin to drink enough wine to get drunk, why does the Bible constantly praise it? You will find many verses in Scripture that clearly say wine is good, a blessing of God, brings peace, prosperity, is an acceptable offering to God, and is a symbol of eternal salvation. And then you will find many cases where Scripture clearly says wine is bad, brings a curse, brings grief, woes, poverty, sexual immorality, violence, other sinful behaviors, and is a symbol of God’s wrath and judgment. Is this a contradiction? No. Is it because of how much of it someone drinks? No.

What if you were to overhear someone say, “That was a funny story”? Would you rightly assume they were talking about, say, a book, or a “story” in a building full of clowns? This is an example of a homograph (two or more words with the same spelling and sound but with different meanings). Whereas whine and wine could be homophones (same sound, different spelling, different meaning), we only use this example of a story compared to wine because wine in Scripture actually means two different things. In Hebrew (in which the Old Testament was written), “yayin” is a generic word that can mean either alcoholic wine, non-alcoholic wine fresh from the vineyard, jam, and even grapes still hanging on the vine. In the Greek language (in which the New Testament was written), there is only one word, “oinos” used to describe alcoholic wine, non-alcoholic wine fresh from the vineyard, jam, and grapes still hanging on the vine. So, the context is very important in determining the real meaning of the usage.

Scripture speaks of one type of wine that is fermented (alcoholic), which has many negative consequences. And then Scripture speaks of a wine that is a non-fermented grape juice that is always associated with the healthy blessing of harvest and prosperity from God.

If you look at a dictionary today, wine means an alcoholic beverage and makes no mention otherwise. All the way up until 45 years ago, dictionaries defined wine as simply being the juice from a grape whether fermented or not. If you look at Scripture, wine is also defined as both fermented and non-fermented. Let’s look at how the Old Testament and New Testament both speak of wine.

Genesis 27:28 – “May God give you of the dew of heaven and of the fatness of the earth and plenty of grain and wine.”

Starting with this first instance we see the word wine, would most people automatically assume that means alcohol? Yes they would. And they would be doing that purely from conjecture. Clearly this is speaking of an association with harvest. Let’s continue with the next instances we see the word wine.

Numbers 18:12 – “All the best of the oil and all the best of the wine and of the grain, the firstfruits of what they give to the LORD, I give to you.”

This is speaking of giving the first fruits, etc., as an offering. This can be seen again in Deuteronomy 14.

Deuteronomy 7:13 – “He will love you, bless you, and multiply you. He will also bless the fruit of your womb and the fruit of your ground, your grain and your wine and your oil, the increase of your herds and the young of your flock, in the land that he swore to your fathers to give you.”
Again, wine is spoken of in association to harvest.

Deuteronomy 11:14 – “He will give the rain for your land in its season, the early rain and the later rain, that you may gather in your grain and your wine and your oil.”

This goes even further in stating not only has wine been associated with blessed harvests, but that wine is merely the gathering of grapes just like the grain.

Deuteronomy 14:23 – “And before the LORD your God, in the place that he will choose, to make his name dwell there, you shall eat the tithe of your grain, of your wine, and of your oil, and the firstborn of your herd and flock, that you may learn to fear the LORD your God always.”

This is again speaking of giving the first fruits, first of the livestock, etc., as an offering.

2 Chronicles 31:5 – “As soon as the command was spread abroad, the people of Israel gave in abundance the firstfruits of grain, wine, oil, honey, and of all the produce of the field. And they brought in abundantly the tithe of everything.”

This speaks even more clearly that wine is not alcoholic.

Other verses include:

Jeremiah 31:12 – “They will come home and sing songs of joy on the heights of Jerusalem. They will be radiant because of the LORD's good gifts--the abundant crops of grain, new wine, and olive oil, and the healthy flocks and herds. Their life will be like a watered garden, and all their sorrows will be gone.”

Jeremiah 40:10 – “I myself will stay at Mizpah to represent you before the Babylonians who come to us, but you are to harvest the wine, summer fruit and olive oil, and put them in your storage jars, and live in the towns you have taken over."

Joel 2:19 – “The LORD replied to them: "I am sending you grain, new wine and olive oil, enough to satisfy you fully; never again will I make you an object of scorn to the nations.”

Haggai 1:11 – “And I called for a drought upon this land and upon the mountains and upon the wheat and upon the wine and upon the oil and upon that which the earth brings forth and upon the men, and upon the beasts and upon every labour of hands.”

Now, let’s switch gears from harvests (both blessed harvests and cursed harvests) to another avenue looking at the use of the word wine.

Proverbs 3:9-10 – “Honor the LORD with your wealth and with the firstfruits of all your produce; then your barns will be filled with plenty, and your presses (vats) will be bursting with wine.”

Isaiah  16:10 – “Joy and gladness are taken away from the orchards; no one sings or shouts in the vineyards; no one treads out wine at the presses, for I have put an end to the shouting.”

Jeremiah 48:33 – “Joy and gladness are gone from the orchards and fields of Moab. I have stopped the flow of wine from the presses; no one treads them with shouts of joy. Although there are shouts, they are not shouts of joy.”

Amos 9:13 – “The days are coming," declares the LORD, "when the reaper will be overtaken by the plowman and the planter by the one treading grapes. New wine will drip from the mountains and flow from all the hills.

These verses speak of such an abundance of grapes that the person picking the grapes and making juice (treading, to step on them) from the grapes won’t be able to keep up. Obviously one can’t pick a big ol’ plump grape, step on it, and get a sip of alcohol. Further, the fermentation process when making alcohol took between two weeks and a month. Obviously this was not alcoholic “wine.”

Now, let’s switch gears from both harvests and treading (again, blessings and curses) and look at yet another avenue.

Isaiah 65:8 – “Thus says the LORD: “As the new wine is found in the cluster, and they say, ‘Do not destroy it, for there is a blessing in it,’ so I will do for my servants’ sake, and not destroy them all.”

This is speaking of grapes still hanging on the vine, and yet uses the word wine to describe its juice. Further, it refers to this “wine” as a blessing.

Finally, we see in Mark 2:22 a quick example of how grape juice is obviously referred to as wine by Jesus Himself. That is perfectly clear as He is saying grape juice would become fermented from the fermented wine that had previously (or some still being in there) been in there, and that a second fermentation process would stretch the wineskins enough to burst them.

So there’s the point in that, every time we see the word “wine,” it does not mean alcoholic. Though, there are times where it does:

Genesis 9:20-22 – “Noah began to be a man of the soil, and he planted a vineyard. He drank of the wine and became drunk and lay uncovered in his tent. And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father and told his two brothers outside.”

Genesis 19:30-36 – '“Lot left Zoar because he was afraid of the people there, and he went to live in a cave in the mountains with his two daughters. And the firstborn said to the younger, “Our father is old, and there is not a man on earth to come in to us after the manner of all the earth. Come, let us make our father drink wine, and we will lie with him, that we may preserve offspring from our father.” So they made their father drink wine that night. And the firstborn went in and lay with her father. He did not know when she lay down or when she arose. The next day, the firstborn said to the younger, “Behold, I lay last night with my father. Let us make him drink wine tonight also. Then you go in and lie with him, that we may preserve offspring from our father.” So they made their father drink wine that night also. And the younger arose and lay with him, and he did not know when she lay down or when she arose. Thus both the daughters of Lot became pregnant by their father."'

Proverbs 20:1 says “Wine is a mocker, strong drink is raging: and whoever is deceived by them is not wise.”

Proverbs 23:20, 21, 29-35 – ‘“Don't associate with those who drink too much wine or with those who gorge themselves on meat. . . . For the drunkard and the glutton will come to poverty, and slumber will clothe them with rags. . . . Who has woe? Who has sorrow? Who has strife? Who has complaining? Who has wounds without cause? Who has redness of eyes? Those who tarry long over wine; those who go to try mixed wine. Do not look at wine when it is red, when it sparkles in the cup and goes down smoothly. In the end it bites like a serpent and poisons like a viper. Your eyes will see strange things, and your heart utter perverse things. You will stagger like a sailor tossed at sea, clinging to a swaying mast. And you will say, “They hit me, but I didn't feel it. I didn't even know it when they beat me up. When will I wake up so I can look for another drink?”’

Joel 3:3 – “They threw dice to decide which of my people would be their slaves. They traded boys to obtain prostitutes and sold girls for enough wine to get drunk.”

Micah 2:11 – “If a man of wind were to come and say falsely, “I will preach to you of wine and strong drink,” he would be just the preacher for this people!”

Habakkuk 2:5 – “Moreover, wine is a traitor, an arrogant man who is never at rest. His greed is as wide as Sheol; like death he has never enough. He gathers for himself all nations and collects as his own all peoples.”

Ephesians 5:18 – “And do not get drunk with wine, for that is debauchery.”

Such verses are obviously talking about alcohol. Grape juice is not going to make you hallucinate. Grape juice is not going to make you drunk and lay naked inside a tent. Grape juice is not going to cause you to impregnate your daughters. Grape juice is not a mocker. No one would ever say their addiction causes them to “never have enough” grape juice. And so on.

To use wine for getting drunk (tipsy, buzzed) is viewed negatively in Scripture, as is when it is used as a “strong drink” (which it automatically would be if not mixed with water). It is viewed favorably when it is non-alcoholic, or when it is alcoholic but not used in a manner other than mixing with water. Further, as we will see, it is viewed favorably when used medicinally.


Medicinal Purposes
1 Timothy 5:23 – “No longer drink only water, but use a little wine for the sake of your stomach and your frequent ailments.”

This verse is a favorite for people who do drink, to try and convince those who do not drink that alcohol is Scripturally fine. To use this verse for the purpose of saying the Apostle Paul – and the Bible as a whole – approves of your drinking habit is quite the head scratcher for a number of reasons.

First of all, Wine does nothing to help your stomach, unless you think ulcers, acid reflux, gastritis, cramping, and irritation of your intestinal tract is good. Wine is said to be rich in antioxidants, including resveratrol, flavonoids, and anthocyanins, which fight free radicals (our bodies already have natural defensives to free radicals anyways, so this is a nothing-burger). But non-alcoholic grape juice and whole grapes have the exact same benefits, without the damaging effects of alcohol. There are also plenty of other food and beverage items are rich in antioxidants. Even better, eating whole grapes has the added benefit of dietary fiber. On top of this, study after study proves that antioxidants are absorbed into your body much better, and stay in your body much longer, when drinking grape juice or eating grapes (preferably red or purple) compared to drinking wine. Further, as reported by WebMD:

‘“Grape juice can also lower the risk of developing the blood clots that lead to heart attacks,       according to unpublished findings from Georgetown University researcher Jane Freedman, MD.        So can red wine, but in this case grape juice is the more practical way to go: “Wine only prevents blood from clotting [when it's consumed] at levels high enough to declare someone legally drunk,” says University of Wisconsin researcher John Folts, Ph.D. “With grape juice, you can drink enough to get the benefit without worrying about becoming intoxicated.” . . . What's more, alcoholic drinks don't seem to improve the function of cells in blood vessel linings the way grape juice does. And alcohol generates free radicals -- unstable oxygen molecules that can actually cause damage to blood vessel tissues -- dampening any of the benefits that red wine's antioxidants may offer.”'

Even further, any health benefits from wine are completely reversed if you have more than one standard drink a day. So, if your body does not absorb the antioxidants from wine near as good as grape juice or whole grapes, and any health benefits found in wine are reversed after even a small amount (5 ounces), why wouldn’t you just have nonalcoholic wine or whole grapes for health (something of which you can have all you want, and keep gaining health benefits throughout the day)? They're packed full with antioxidants and flavor, and you can drink all you want without having to worry about a designated driver.

Secondly, Paul is telling Timothy to use a little wine. Obviously a little wine does not mean a moderate amount or a lot (where many drinkers would say a little means a couple glasses or so, if viewing this verse in Greek, the word word here literally means a “puny” amount). This also tells the reader that Timothy had been abstinent from alcoholic wine, or else Paul would not have had a reason to say “no longer drink only water.” And by saying “no longer drink only water” implies that wine was to be mixed with water to dilute the wine and to purify the water.

Third and most importantly in regards to the point being made in this section, Paul is telling Timothy to use a little wine. Do we use wine, or drink wine? Do we use medicine, or drink medicine? Obviously Paul is telling Timothy to use wine for medicinal purposes, to use it as an antiseptic means to kill many of the germs and bacterial organisms in the drinking water and, thus, reducing their harsh effect on Timothy’s weak stomach (this verse viewed in Greek means “feebleness and disease”). Even if we were to use a stretch of the imagination and think Paul meant for Timothy to use a little wine, without being mixed with water, how does that apply to any of us anyways? It would still be for medicinal purposes only. How do we justify drinking socially, casually, and recreationally by Paul clearly stating, “for the sake of your stomach and your frequent ailments”? Do you tell people at a party, “Oh, yeah, this Crown and Coke is for my stomach disease.”? Further, alcohol is notoriously not good for your stomach, among other parts of your body. So does it make sense for a person to dilute the alcohol and make cleaner drinking water? Yes, especially because alcohol itself does nothing to help your stomach and actually has the opposite effect.


Any More Verses?
The verse above is commonly used to somehow “prove” alcohol is Scripturally acceptable to drink socially, casually, and recreationally. Now that we’ve discussed that verse, are there any others that are also used in this way?

Psalm 104:14-15 – “He makes grass grow for the cattle, and plants for people to cultivate-- bringing forth food from the earth: wine that gladdens human hearts, oil to make their faces shine, and bread that sustains their hearts."

There is never a mention this is alcoholic wine, non-alcoholic wine, or even grapes still on the vine. Maybe the use of the word “wine” just means refreshes thirst and provides nourishment. Maybe this is just speaking of how God providing a blessed harvest of grapes makes someone happy. Zechariah 9:17 says grain makes people cheerful. So, how is grain and wine making someone happy different? Judges 9:27 says those who picked grapes were merry and the grape treaders were merry. So, how is that any different? Just like with the other instances where wine was referencing grapes at the harvest, this is the likely conclusion again. To say that this usage of the word wine means alcoholic wine would be mere conjecture.

John 2:1-11 – “On the third day there was a wedding at Cana in Galilee, and the mother of Jesus was there. Jesus also was invited to the wedding with his disciples. When the wine ran out, the mother of Jesus said to him, “They have no wine.” And Jesus said to her, “Woman, what does this have to do with me? My hour has not yet come.” His mother said to the servants, “Do whatever he tells you.” Now there were six stone water jars there for the Jewish rites of purification, each holding twenty or thirty gallons. Jesus said to the servants, “Fill the jars with water.” And they filled them up to the brim. And he said to them, “Now draw some out and take it to the master of the feast.” So they took it. When the master of the feast tasted the water now become wine, and did not know where it came from (though the servants who had drawn the water knew), the master of the feast called the bridegroom and said to him, “Everyone serves the good wine first, and when people have drunk freely, then the poor wine. But you have kept the good wine until now.” This, the first of his signs, Jesus did at Cana in Galilee, and manifested his glory. And his disciples believed in him.”

This is the biggie, say people who drink: “Well Jesus made wine! So it must be ok to drink!” There’s a whole lot to unpack here. (*Takes deep breath*)

First of all, can we not see how insanely out of character it would be for Jesus to make what was up to 180 gallons of alcohol? But it gets even worse. Many of those who use these verses as a defense in their drinking will say, “See, obviously it was alcoholic wine because guests were already drunk!” So, Scripture tells us time and time again that wine (also called “strong drink”) is a mocker, bites like a serpent, leads to poor judgment and destruction, that drunkenness is a grave sin and, yet, people will actually say Jesus would then give drunks even more to drink, with no gluttonous restrictions (yet another sin), participated in a drinking party (another sin according to 1 Peter 4:3), and aided in a likely trail of other sins? That’s even more preposterous than a scenario such as Jesus saying prostitution is sin and yet He brings in 180 prostitutes for the guests. After all, at least the sober person can make a moral decision whereas a drunk or near drunk cannot! So, the One Who holds the universe together, went back on His own Word rebuking drunkenness, gave drunks more alcohol so they could get even drunker, and somehow this opinion is ok to some of us? It’s frightening to think we’ve watered-down our Savior to be our bar buddy.

It’s pretty difficult to see all of the verses that at least say drinking is dangerous and unwise, and apostles like Peter pleading with people to do away with such things – “Beloved, I urge you as sojourners and exiles to abstain from the passions of the flesh, which wage war against your soul” – and Jesus coming to fill up 180 gallons of alcohol just setting up people for failure!

Remember, to drink straight wine was seen as a barbaric act at this time in history. So it’s not likely at all people would have drank it straight. And if anyone did, then it was their own fault. If they were all doing it and Jesus made plenty more for them, then Jesus was an enabler. Do any of us truly, truly believe Jesus would be an enabler to a sin that can very well spiral into a list of other sins?

Furthermore, about 1 Peter 4:3, this is the only usage of the Greek word “oinophlugia,” which means “excess of wine.” On top of that “drinking parties” is translated in the Greek (“potos”) having nothing to do with excess or drunkenness but simply being at a party where there is drinking that even gives an opportunity for excess. So Scripture condemns these acts and, yet, we are to believe Jesus gave drunks an additional up to 180 gallons of alcohol to enjoy?

Was this alcoholic wine? It could have been. Were guests drunk? The text does not tell us that information. How does someone get that guests were drunk from the words “have drunk freely” or “have well drunk” or “have had plenty” depending on the translation? Could “you have kept the good wine until now” mean good tasting non-alcoholic wine? Since the text doesn’t say, it’s just as likely that it was grape juice and not alcoholic wine. Don’t you think the Creator of the universe could create something that tasted great, whether it be non-alcoholic or alcoholic wine? It would have been a whole lot better than what some guy in a back alley would make. The “master of the feast” could very well be stating disbelief that someone would serve the best tasting wine at the end of an event when people’s taste buds cannot tell the difference anymore from good and bad tasting beverages.

Could it have been alcoholic wine, though at a much weaker content than modern-day wine and then that wine was then to be diluted even more by the water it was meant to purify? Absolutely. Would that make it much harder to get drunk? Obviously that would affect your bladder long before it would affect your mind. Common historical sense tells us that it would have been highly embarrassing and a social disgrace for those hosting the wedding to run out of anything for their guests; it was poor planning, or lack of funds on their part. Jesus bailed them out! So, would this to-be-diluted wine have saved the embarrassment of the bride and groom? Yes.

If we are going to go down the path of using conjecture only to say people got drunk and even more drunk from this wine, then what about the fact the text doesn’t say anybody but the “master of the feast” actually drank the beverage that Jesus made? By using conjecture only, perhaps this one person tried the beverage, complimented it, and then it either just sat there or was poured out! That’s ridiculous, but it’s the even less conjecture than those who use these verses to support their drinking habits.

Luke 7:34 – ‘“The Son of Man has come eating and drinking, and you say, “Look at him! A glutton and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and sinners!”’

It’s been said by those trying to defend their drinking habits that Jesus got drunk and, thus, it’s ok for them to get drunk as well. And those who will not go that far will at least say Jesus was called a drunkard because He drank lots of wine. It makes far more sense those (those who thought of Jesus as an enemy) calling Jesus a drunkard were mocking His association with people who were drunks or at least drank a lot. He ministered to many who weren’t viewed as outstanding citizens (a friend of tax collectors and sinners, etc.), which angered many. He was not encouraging the lifestyle of these people but was simply trying to lift them out of their messed up lives. Furthermore, in the same verse, He was also accused of being a glutton. Would we accuse Jesus, “He Who was without sin,” of being a glutton, and thus justifying our gluttonous habits? That would not have been characteristic of Him and would have contradicted a number of Scriptures. The Pharisees also accused Jesus of being possessed by Satan and it was by drawing the power of Satan that allowed Jesus to cast demons out of people (Matthew 9:34; 10:24-25; 12:22-24; Mark 3:22). Does that mean Jesus really was possessed and used evil powers? No. We also find in the historical record that the Jewish Talmud accused Jesus of performing wonders (such as healings and exorcisms) by the use of sorcery from Satan. Did Jesus use sorcery from Jesus just because He was accused of it? No.

Matthew 26:17, 26-29 – “Now on the first day of Unleavened Bread the disciples came to Jesus, saying, “Where will you have us prepare for you to eat the Passover? . . . Now as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and after blessing it broke it and gave it to the disciples, and said, “Take, eat; this is my body.” And he took a cup, and when he had given thanks he gave it to them, saying, “Drink of it, all of you, for this is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins. I tell you I will not drink again of this fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father’s kingdom.”

This event (which can also be found in Mark 14 and Luke 12) is referred to as “The Lord’s Supper” and was the institution of what Christians refer to as Communion. People will say that alcoholic wine was used during this time. There are three main points to be made. First, the Greek wording for wine is never even mentioned. This, like Genesis 40:10-11, for instance is clearly speaking of grape juice: “and on the vine there were three branches. As soon as it budded, its blossoms shot forth, and the clusters ripened into grapes. Pharaoh’s cup was in my hand, and I took the grapes and pressed them into Pharaoh’s cup and placed the cup in Pharaoh’s hand.”

Secondly, yeast is required for alcoholic wine. Yet, yeast (“leaven”) is exactly what was not allowed, as this was also the time of the Feast of Unleavened Bread: “Seven days you shall eat unleavened bread, and on the seventh day there shall be a feast to the Lord. Unleavened bread shall be eaten for seven days; no leavened bread shall be seen with you, and no leaven shall be seen with you in all your territory” (Exodus 13:6-7). So, what beverage “of the vine,” without yeast, would someone drink during this time: fresh grape juice.

Third, to remember Jesus’ spilt, pure blood during Communion time would not be to drink alcohol. By definition, alcohol is the decay and rot of something fresh and pure. Yeast is added to grape juice to enhance this rotting process. Thus, how could something rotten represent the pureness of Christ’s blood?

With these verses in mind, and those having to do with medicinal purposes, do you see how far people will go to try and justify drinking alcohol themselves? That’s called either being too liberal with life, an addict, a fool, or all of the above.


What Modern-Day Science Says About the Dangers of Alcohol

  • According to the conclusion in 2018 made by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington, ‘“There is no safe level of drinking alcohol.” Says Dr. Emmanuela Gakidou of the IHME, “The health risks associated with alcohol are massive. Our findings are consistent with other recent research, which found clear and convincing correlations between drinking and premature death, cancer, and cardiovascular problems. Zero alcohol consumption minimizes the overall risk of health loss. . . . The myth that one or two drinks a day are good for you is just that – a myth.”’
  • Also in a 2018 conclusion, CNN Health reports plainly, ‘“No amount of alcohol is good for your overall health, global study says. . . . Alcohol also causes seven types of cancer, including mouth, breast and bowel cancers. . . . There's no amount of liquor, wine or beer that is safe for your overall health, according to a new analysis of 2016 global alcohol consumption and disease risk. Alcohol was the leading risk factor for disease and premature death in men and women between the ages of 15 and 49 worldwide in 2016, accounting for nearly one in 10 deaths. For all ages, alcohol was associated with 2.8 million deaths that year. Those deaths include alcohol-related cancer and cardiovascular diseases, infectious diseases . . . intentional injury such as violence and self-harm, and traffic accidents and other unintentional injuries such as drowning and fires. . . . "The most surprising finding was that even small amounts of alcohol use contribute to health loss globally," said senior study author Emmanuela Gakidou, a professor at the University of Washington's Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. "We're used to hearing that a drink or two a day is fine. But the evidence is the evidence.” . . . “Even the lowest levels of alcohol intake increase our risks," Helen Stokes-Lampard, chair of the Royal College of General Practitioners in the UK, said in a statement.” . . . For ages 50 and up, cancers were the leading cause of alcohol-related deaths; road injuries, self-harm and tuberculosis were the top causes of death around the world in the 15-to-49 age group.  However, in terms of total numbers, Gakidou said, "most deaths from alcohol come from cardiovascular disease and cancers.” . . . University of Cambridge epidemiologist Steven Bell co-authored a separate study published in April in [the international medical journal] The Lancet that found drinking is beneficial in lowering the risk for heart attack. However, that study's big takeaway was that even one drink a day could shorten life expectancy; long-term reduction in alcohol use added one to two years to life expectancy at age 40. Based on these findings, at no point is there a level of consumption that appears to lower the overall risk of developing any of the wide array of diseases investigated in comparison to non-drinking. The take-home message being that people shouldn't drink under the belief that it will lower their risk of disease, and those of us who opt to drink should minimize our intake if we wish to prolong our life and well-being.”’
The scariest statistic wasn’t even included in these findings: “Drinking under the age of 15, a   growing problem in the US and other countries, was not included.” According to the National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, “Youth who use alcohol before the age of 15 are five times more likely to become dependent on alcohol than adults who begin drinking at age 21.”


  • According to reporting by The Guardian in 2018, ‘“The risks for a 40-year-old of drinking over the recommended daily limit were comparable to smoking, said one leading scientist. “Above two units a day, the death rates steadily climb,” said David Spiegelhalter, Winton professor for the public understanding of risk at the University of Cambridge. . . . A 40-year-old drinking four units a day above the guidelines has roughly two years’ lower life expectancy, which is around a 20th of their remaining life. This works out at about an hour per day. . . . Says Tim Chico, professor of cardiovascular medicine, “This study makes clear that on balance there are no health benefits from drinking alcohol.”’
  • Today reports in 2018, ‘“More than 5 drinks a week could shorten lives by years, study finds. If you already drink alcohol, drinking less may help you live longer, researchers say. . . . People who follow government guidelines to have a drink or so a day could be drinking themselves into an early grave, researchers said Thursday [April 12, 2018].”’
  • Today reported in 2015, ‘“Those of us enjoying an alcoholic beverage a day for our health may want to reconsider pouring another drink. A recent study published in the British Medical Journal finds that one drink a day increases a woman’s cancer risk. “Just one drink a day can increase your risk for certain kinds of cancers,” says Dr. Natalie Azar, NBC medical contributor. “It showed the risk for women, and I think what’s even more interesting or concerning about the findings is that it showed this increased risk with what we consider light to moderate alcohol consumption within what is considered an acceptable daily amount.” Researchers looked at data from 136,000 men and women in studies that examined behaviors and overall outcome for 30 years. People who drank more experienced a higher risk of cancer. For women, quaffing just one alcoholic beverage daily caused increased risk of alcohol-related cancers, including cancers of the breast, liver, bowel, throat, mouth, esophagus and larynx. . . . “The idea that alcohol is related to cancer is obviously nothing new,” says Azar. “Alcohol, when you take it in, has to be metabolized — aka, broken down into different things. The first breakdown product is called acetaldehyde. It is known to be a carcinogen. The other idea is that certain cancers, which are estrogen-related, such as breast — alcohol can also raise estrogen levels.”’
As far as breast cancer goes, there are three causes that many wouldn’t even think about: abortion, GMO soy, and alcohol. Specifically speaking about alcohol, besides the common weight gain, raised insulin levels, and higher blood pressure which all lead to their own health issues, other major risks for women include poor fertility and a higher risk for miscarriages. A study of thousands of couples found that those who abstain from alcohol completely got pregnant much sooner than even very light drinkers, and they also had a lower miscarriage rate. Even moderate drinking (classified in this study as half a bottle of wine a week) was associated with an 18% reduction in success rates for women trying to get pregnant.


  • ‘“In terms of cancer risk, there is no safe level of drinking,” says Nicola Smith, health information officer for Cancer Research UK.  “The cancers most closely linked to alcohol consumption are those of the mouth, esophagus, bowel, breast and throat,” she explains.  The more you drink, the higher your risk because ethanol in alcohol is broken down into acetaldehyde which damages DNA and directly impacts cells that cause cancer.  Plus, “If you’re smoking and drinking at the same time, you’re increasing your risk of mouth and throat cancer because alcohol makes cells more responsive to the toxins in tobacco smoke.”’
  • As Time reported in 2018, ‘“The safest level of drinking is none at all, citing heightened risks of health problems ranging from car crashes to cancer.” According to Dr. Sarah Hartz, an assistant professor of psychiatry at the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, “I can’t think of it as a healthy behavior. . . . Don’t fool yourself into thinking this is a healthy behavior.”’
  • As reported by The Livestrong Foundation, ‘“Remember how moderate drinking was once believed to be a boon to our health, our hearts and our brains? Well, thanks to a recent study that bubble just burst. According to new research [performed by the University of Oxford and University College London and] published in the British Medical Journal, moderate drinking (the equivalent of one 5-ounce glass of wine per day) . . . can cause some concerning changes to the brain. These changes include three times the risk of right-sided hippocampal atrophy (a type of brain damage that can impact spatial navigation and potentially lead to Alzheimer’s and dementia) of non-drinkers. . . . The study, which tracked 550 participants for more than 30 years since 1985, also found that heavy drinkers (those who had two glasses of wine or beer each night) had the largest mental decline. . . . But what surprised researchers the most was how moderate drinkers were affected. . . . Among those who didn’t drink at all, 35 percent had a shrinkage on the right side of the hippocampus portion of the brain compared to 77 percent of heavy drinkers, who had a similar shrinkage. For moderate drinkers, the figure was 65 percent. . . . This isn’t the first study where the “one glass of wine a day” habit has come under scrutiny. A study published last month [March of 2018] concluded that a glass of wine a day could also increase a woman’s risk of breast cancer. . . . If anything, these studies may be a good wake-up call to reassess our drinking habits, including whether we’ve been grossly underestimating what “moderate drinking” actually means. . . . Research shows that regaining brain function (along with a resurgence of new brain cells) is possible within a year of abstaining from alcohol. And a few other added benefits of kicking the alcohol habit include a lowered risk of certain cancers, pancreatitis, digestive problems, stroke, depression and anxiety.”’
  • As reported by The Cut, ‘“Although many of us routinely indulge in a glass (or two or three) of wine at the end of the day, a new study suggests that our glass-a-day habit might not be healthy: Having a glass of wine (or another alcoholic drink) each day has been found to increase a person’s breast cancer risk. . . . As the Washington Post reports, a new review from the American Institute for Cancer Research and the World Cancer Research Fund analyzed 119 studies that used data from 12 million women worldwide. While a standard drink has 14 grams of alcohol, the study found that just 10 grams of alcohol per day – which is the equivalent of one small glass of wine, beer or other alcohol – is linked to a heightened breast cancer risk [and doubles for postmenopausal women]. . . . Per the Post: “This suggests there is no level of alcohol use that is completely safe in terms of breast cancer,” said Anne McTiernan, a cancer-prevention researcher at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle and one of the report’s lead authors. . . . Alcohol increases estrogen in the body, which is known to increase a woman’s breast cancer risk.”’

One final point is that wine (and beer) is contaminated with hazardous levels of heavy metals, well above the allowable limits set by the USFDA, which contribute significantly to diseases such as Parkinson's and Alzheimer’s. These include arsenic, lead, mercury, cadmium, iron, copper, vanadium and manganese. To be fair, similar levels of arsenic and lead have been found in nonalcoholic apple and grape juices in the past but have since been nearly eliminated and are at least far below the FDA limits. Also, drinking water has been found to have lead in it, though that is a local governmental problem.

Even before recent, significant studies were published, the facts were already being uncovered about how dangerous alcoholic consumption is. In 2010, the World Health Assembly passed a resolution urging countries to “strengthen national responses to public health problems caused by the harmful use of alcohol.” Further, the government of the United Kingdom saw the need to make new limits on alcoholic consumption in 2016: ‘“New guidelines for alcohol consumption, produced by the UK Chief Medical Officers, warn that drinking any level of alcohol increases the risk of a range of cancers. This is supported by a new review from the Committee on Carcinogenicity on alcohol and cancer risk. . . . It is now known that the risks start from any level of regular drinking and increase with the amount being drunk, and the new guidelines are aimed at keeping the risk of mortality from cancers or other diseases low. The links between alcohol and cancer were not fully understood in the original guidelines, which came out in 1995.”’ In the U.S., even though we’ve yet to lower the limits, the Department of Health and Human Services has since removed language from their alcohol guidelines about drinking at any level lowering the risk of heart disease. According to the researchers who published the groundbreaking findings in the British Medical Journal that we discussed above, “Our findings support the recent reduction in U.K. safe limits and call into question the current U.S. guidelines, which suggest that up to 24.5 units a week is safe for men, as we found increased odds of hippocampal atrophy at just 14.”

To put in perspective the U.S., limit, it is, 5 servings of 5 ounces of wine per week. As a reference for 5 ounces, a can of Coca-Cola has 12 ounces. You can imagine then that the weekly limit for what we would qualify today as “strong drink” would be absolutely miniscule. These limits are nearly double the limit found in the UK, and even at those lower limits scientists have found alcohol to be dangerous. With this “safe” U.S. limit in mind, just one half glass of wine above this limit lowers your life expectancy by “about the same as a cigarette” says David Spiegelhalter, a risk expert at the University of Cambridge. Further, states Victoria Taylor, a senior dietitian at the British Heart Foundation, “We should always remember that alcohol guidelines should act as a limit, not a target, and try to drink well below this threshold.” Keywords well below.

With that said, in regards to a beverage similar to wine, grape juice actually has plenty of heart and overall health benefits. Thus, if people were actually looking out for their health and not looking to have an escape from reality, then grape juice is what they would drink. That is not to say all people who drink are merely looking for a feeling; there are surely lots of people who truly think it is at least healthy at the same time. But now the facts are displayed for what is and is not healthy.


Strictly Psychologically Speaking
As we stated earlier, “Before alcohol affects your central nervous system and deteriorates motor skills, it affects our inhibitions and silences the conscience. As our moral restraints become blurred at the same rate as our neural reflexes . . . you set yourself up to become free to multiple avenues of sins. . . . Alcohol changes your personality and makes you less morally strong.” And directly above we stated that people use alcohol as “an escape from reality” and because they are “looking for a feeling.”

Alcohol is a mind-altering drug. First and foremost, do you know why exactly that alcohol affects the mind? Alcohol gives you that slight feeling of euphoria and escape because that is literally the affect of your body being poisoned. And using the word poison there is not be of exaggeration; that is literally what is happening, as your brain is not functioning properly and those feelings arise from that fact.

When alcohol reaches the brain it immediately affects the brain's ability to control behavior and body functions. And the affects are much quicker than you would imagine. According to a report, for instance, by Texas A&M University's Center for Alcohol and Drug Education Studies, as little as one beer can significantly affect judgment and driving decisions. You may not think it has affected you, but it has. The BAC (Blood Alcohol Content) is the measure of a person’s level of intoxication or the amount of alcohol in a person’s blood system. In the U.S., once someone reaches a .08 BAC they are legally drunk. To reach that level, it takes on average three cans of beer, 15 ounces of wine, and 4.5 ounces of anything stronger than that (again, as a reference point, a can of Coke has 12 ounces). The report continues: “We found that persons who registered a .04 - one-half the amount it takes to be legally intoxicated - had significant impairment in their driving abilities. In a nutshell, what it means is you don't have to be staggering, fall-down drunk to have driving problems if you've drinking. A very small amount can affect your driving ability and especially the decisions you make while driving. A person may think to himself or herself, “I've only had a couple of beers so I can drive okay,” but their judgment can be severely affected and they don't even know it. Our tests showed that at .04, again one-half the level of legal intoxication, drivers had trouble with such skills as skid control, crash simulation and other maneuvering tests through stationary cones.”’ That is .04. But even at .02 is when moral judgment and inhibitions begin to be affected.

What happens at even this low level is that alcohol directly affects brain chemistry by altering levels of neurotransmitters – the chemical messengers that transmit the signals throughout the body that control thought processes, behavior and emotion. Of the three – excitatory, inhibitory, or modulatory – alcohol affects both excitatory neurotransmitters and inhibitory neurotransmitters. For examples of how alcohol affects excitatory neurotransmitters, alcohol increases levels of dopamine and norepinephrine (also known as noradrenaline) in the brain present in the brain. Dopamine is responsible for sending signals of pleasure. Thus, when levels of dopamine are elevated, this creates the “high” (“buzz”) you get. Norepinephrine increases arousal and excitement, lowering inhibitions and making you not care about the consequences of your actions. An example of an inhibitory neurotransmitter is Gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA), which reduces energy levels and calms everything down and results in sedation. Alcohol increases the effects of GABA in the same way as Xanax and Valium, resulting in sedation (one reason why you cannot take medicine with alcohol being because your heart rate and respiratory system will slow down to the point of passing out and even dying). A third excitatory neurotransmitter is glutamate (the most common neurotransmitter in the central nervous system), which is involved in virtually every major excitatory brain function. But, as opposed to dopamine and norepinephrine, glutamate is suppressed. This causes a significant slowdown in the “highways” of the brain.

This is quite the conundrum. On one hand, because the “reward center” of our brains are fed dopamine and norepinephrine, we are tricked into thinking we are going to have a good experience. But what is actually happening is that, because you think alcohol is making you feel good, you want to drink more in order to try and have a higher release of dopamine and norepinephrine. Yet, as you continue to drink, your body is suppressing more and more glutamate and you are actually enhancing feelings of depression. Thus, while in the process of drinking alcohol acts as a stimulant, but as drinking tapers off it is a strong sedative.

Imagine the analogy that you’re sad and you think picking apples will help your mood. You’ve worked hard picking apples and you feel happy about the full basket you’ve got. But when you go to carry it home you realize the bottom of the basket has rotted out, the apples spill everywhere, and now you’re even sadder than when you started. Or imagine a triangle: as your blood alcohol content (BAC) level ascends on one side, you think you are setting yourself up for success. But, because your body will only release so many neurotransmitters, it’s at that point when, on the other side of the triangle going down, your body experiences even more depression, anxiety, tension, restlessness, fatigue, confusion, irritability, loneliness, loss of self esteem and self worth, etc (which then spiral to become other issues such as having financial problems). What happens then is that, because a person craves the “high” (“buzz”) they originally get from alcohol, they use it to try and escape reality. But the reality is that they are going to slide back into an even heightened state of the very things they are trying to escape from! States Paul Wallace, emeritus professor of public health at University College London: “Alcohol gets through the blood-brain barrier where it works as a depressant. We feel quite excited and stimulated when we drink because it’s having a depressing effect on controlling behaviors such as judgment, self-monitoring, planning and reasoning. Over time this gives you a higher propensity to mood problems such as anxiety and depression.”

Furthermore, because your body will eventually become more and more tolerant to alcohol, you must increase the levels you consume. Your brain will need more and more, just like how your brain will need stronger milligrams of prescription drugs or how your muscles need more weight and different movements in order to grow. Then, with more drinking, the dopamine effect diminishes until it's almost nonexistent. It’s at this point when someone becomes “hooked” on the release of dopamine even though they are no longer receiving any! So, as you increase the levels of alcohol you consume, your problems in life are only going to continue to be heightened and you will be on the sure path to a dependence on alcohol and then an addiction.

For anyone who thinks their occasional use will never become anything more than having an occasional glass of wine at dinner, say needing to have a bottle of something in the house in case a day goes awry or for self medicating depression, needs to grasp how there is a very real habitual path to dependence and then addiction. To see this firsthand, we all have those people in our lives who are recovering alcoholics. They will always struggle with that. And that should make us think, “Wow this substance took down someone very near and dear to me. Perhaps you know it took them down so much that you abstain from alcohol when in their company. That could be me next, or someone in my family, or maybe they will get back into it and get sick or have an accident due to it, etc. When we see something on the news, we universally think, “I’m so glad that could never happen to me.” Yet, look at those close to you. It happened to people you didn’t think it would. To say you can control that, tell that to every alcoholic or every person who is at least dependant on alcohol to escape reality; they will say the same thing that people who struggle with other sins will say: “I never meant to go this far. Now, I don’t know how to go back.” The fact is, once you’ve reached a point, psychologically your body has adapted to the point that you will always struggle with a particular sin (like a heavy person who loses a lot of weight; their fat cells are always going to be bigger than those of a thin person).

An additional major reason we need to be careful with alcohol use, especially when starting off as a light drinker, is the fact that it’s a case-by-case basis as to how many “feel good” neurotransmitters our brains will initially release as our BAC level grows. Let’s just pretend there is a scale from 1-100. Your friend down the road may have a release measured at 25. You, on the other hand, would have a release measured at 97, but you just don’t know it yet. Thus, if you began drinking at a light or moderate level, you would be significantly more susceptible to enjoying the initial “buzz” you get from alcohol and then becoming a more frequent drinker until, possibly, you became an alcoholic. This fact is echoed, for instance, by researcher Jennifer M. Mitchell, PhD, of the University of California, San Francisco, says. “Greater endorphin release was associated with more hazardous drinking. We believe this is an important step in understanding where and how alcohol acts in the brain.” Family history also plays a critical role. The fact is, if someone in your family had a strong struggle with alcohol, it is very likely to be in your genes as well. So, one may not know if they’d be easy prey for sin to have a foothold in their life. Why, then, play with fire by even tasting things in case you like it and then start to really like it?


We Each Have a Right to Warn Others About the Dangers of Alcohol
Modern-day science says of alcoholic consumption that the health risks associated with alcohol are massive, there are clear and convincing correlations between drinking and premature death, cancer, and cardiovascular problems, one or two drinks a day being good for us is just a myth, one drink a day (of wine or another alcoholic drink) increases a woman’s cancer risk for multiple types of cancer (including breast, liver, bowel, throat, mouth, esophagus and larynx), alcohol is the leading risk factor for disease and premature death in men and women between the ages of 15 and 49, the risks for a 40-year-old of drinking over the recommended daily limit were comparable to smoking, there are no health benefits from drinking alcohol, people who follow government guidelines to have a drink or so a day could be drinking themselves into an early grave, it is a known carcinogen, it can raise estrogen levels, it damages DNA and directly impacts cells that cause cancer, we shouldn’t fool ourselves into thinking it is a healthy behavior, and one 5-ounce glass of wine per day can cause three times the risk of brain damage that can impact spatial navigation and, as even one drink a day kills valuable brain cells and causes damage to cognition and memory, will potentially lead to dementia and Alzheimer’s disease.

And all of what we have discussed is simply the low end and moderate level of the spectrum. When it comes to heavy drinkers, says Tim Chico, professor of cardiovascular medicine and head of the Department of Infection, Immunity & Cardiovascular Disease at the University of Sheffield, smokers lose on average 10 years of life, compared to heavy drinkers who “are likely to lose even more life expectancy.”

Alcohol in any form does not contribute positively to the health of your body. But let’s say it helped your heart, which the alcohol industry claims of red wine; even if staying under the governmental “limit” of alcohol consumption were to slightly reduce your rate of non-fatal heart attacks, says Dr. Angela Wood from the University of Cambridge, “this must be balanced against the higher risk associated with other serious – and potentially fatal – cardiovascular diseases”, such as death from stroke for multiple reasons, coronary disease beyond heart attack, heart failure, fatal hypertensive disease and fatal aortic aneurysm, on top of other health hazards such as communicable diseases (i.e. cirrhosis of the liver due to alcohol use, diabetes, epilepsy, pancreatitis, infections, etc.), accidents, and multiple forms of cancer.

For us in the world who have purified drinking water and refrigeration, it is entirely unnecessary to drink a mixture of alcoholic wine and water. With that fact in mind, on top of Scripture condemning the use of alcohol much weaker than found today, on top of the significantly heightened dangers now that the potency is much higher, why on Earth do we act so liberally and carelessly? Study after study, as we have seen clearly states, zero alcohol consumption minimizes the overall risk of health loss, no amount of alcohol is good for your overall health, there's no amount of liquor, wine or beer that is safe for your overall health, there is no safe level of drinking alcohol, at no point is there a level of consumption that appears to lower the overall risk of developing any of the wide array of diseases investigated in comparison to non-drinking, in terms of cancer risk there is no safe level of drinking, and the safest level of drinking is none at all.

As reported by the Journal of the American Medical Association, from 2001 to 2013 the number of alcoholics in the U.S. alone rose by 49%, meaning 13% of Americans as a whole meet the criteria of being alcoholics. Of course, there were people who were not honest when being asked the necessary questions in the study. It was also found that nearly one in four adults specifically under the age of 30 met the criteria for being alcoholics. Further, as the study ended in 2013, that sharp observed rate is inevitably higher today.  “I think the increases are due to stress and despair and the use of alcohol as a coping mechanism,” said the study's lead author, Bridget Grant, a researcher at the National Institutes of Health. Of course the rate has increased. After all, what else would you expect in an ever-growing “all about me” culture that leaves us searching for something to help us cope with reality?

With that in mind, and the fact that alcohol affects certain people significantly higher than others, on top of the fact there is zero benefit from alcohol, wouldn’t that make you look at that drink in your hand and say it just isn’t worth it? Alcohol is so entirely engrained into our cultural upbringing that many of us automatically compartmentalize it as something either cool, sophisticated, harmless, or all the above. Perhaps now with science showing alcohol’s true identity, people will take the initiative to not only stop their own use but to also warn others.


Abstinence Is Always Commended Scripturally but Not Socially
We see with the Nazirite vow, Timothy’s effort to not even have enough wine to purify his drinking water, leaders in the church, even John the Baptist, etc., abstaining from alcohol was always commendable. John MacArthur said well: “It should not take a doctor of divinity to notice that Scripture consistently celebrates virtues such as self-control, sober-mindedness, purity of heart, the restraint of our fleshly lusts, and similar fruits of the Holy Spirit's sanctifying work in our lives. Surely these are what we ought hold in highest esteem, model in our daily lives, and honor on our websites, rather than trying so hard to impress the world with unfettered indulgence in the very things that hold so many unbelievers in bondage.”

Yet it is an oddity for someone to abstain today. To get more personal and use the word “I” for once, I do not drink. I don’t try to be the total conscience of everyone; if someone else has a drink around me, so be it. But to my not drinking, it’s always met with the question, whether it’s most likely a loaded one or genuinely not: “Why?” But I would ask, with all that we’ve discussed and could discuss in this post, how come it isn’t the other way around: abstainers asking those who drink the “why” question?

Besides the obvious health dangers, a further reason I do not drink is because I find zero justification for introducing something into my life that blurs moral restraints and can easily become habit forming. I will not give alcohol even the chance to have a foothold in my life. As Paul states, “But put on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make no provision for the flesh, to gratify its desires” (Romans 13:14). And, again Paul: I, too, “will not be mastered by anything” (1 Corinthians 6:12). I have no desire for the taste or the idea of alcohol. But perhaps I would be one of those people who would release a lot of “feel good” neurotransmitters and could become hooked easily. I will heed to the warning by James: “But each person is tempted when he is lured and enticed by his own desire. Then desire when it has conceived gives birth to sin, and sin when it is fully grown brings forth death.”

Scripture is clear: “Do not be foolish, but understand what the Lord’s will is.” (Ephesians 5:17). The mature Christian does not try to balance the idea of how many “fun, enjoyable, exciting” things they can do and still be in step with Christ. Rather, they ask if there is anything they can do that will refine their ability to recognize the will of God. In general, then, alcohol does nothing to increase one’s sensitivity to God’s will but, instead, it weakens our desire to treat our bodies as the temples where God dwells: “Do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit within you, whom you have from God? You are not your own, for you were bought with a price. So glorify God in your body” (1 Corinthians 6:19-20). Further,  all, it is possible to grieve the Holy Spirit in us (Ephesians 4:30). It contradicts and threatens what I value most: my ever-growing personal relationship with my God.

Another reason is that an adult does not need something to help them escape reality anymore than a kiddo does. This seems to be a cheap substitute for not trying to get things in your life in order and also a cheap substitute for prayer itself. God will use our sufferings to sharpen our character, so why would we drink something that would inhibit that growth process? Only Christ will heal us and satisfy us: “Surely he has borne our griefs and carried our sorrows; yet we esteemed him stricken, smitten by God, and afflicted. But he was pierced for our transgressions; he was crushed for our iniquities; upon him was the chastisement that brought us peace, and with his wounds we are healed” (Isaiah 53:4-6).

And another reason is that alcohol is an industry fueled by a particular mindset. Whether it is fair or not, the truth is that alcohol is commonly perceived to be paired with poor motivations and immoral behavior. So when unbelievers see Christians partaking in the same activity they do, they have every right to at least think to themselves, “Then what's the big deal with this whole “born again” stuff? They act just like us!”

In conclusion, when your kid starts drinking you’ll hate alcohol more and more. When someone you love becomes an addict, you will hate alcohol. When your spouse cheats on you and blames it on alcohol, you will hate them both. When someone you know dies of throat, stomach, liver, or other cancers from it, you’ll hate it. When your friend gets mangled from a wreck so bad from a drunk driver that there is a closed casket funeral, you’ll hate alcohol. When you see someone being beat, or personally feel the abuse, you will hate alcohol. If you never experience any of that, lucky you I suppose?

For something that contributes to 205,000 deaths each year. It can knock off more than a decade of your life expectancy. It causes multiple forms of cancer. It’s not safe for babies in the womb. It will eventually only hurt your kids and your family as a whole. Over one half of all traffic fatalities, homicides, rapes, drownings, physical abuses, rapes, suicides, assaults, and robberies are the direct result of alcohol. Millions and millions of Americans alone are struggling with and ruining lives and businesses due to alcohol. Culture says we cannot have fun, celebrate, or even be intimate without drinking. It’s like culture saying “what’s love without a diamond, or Easter without a chocolate rabbit?” I call BS to all of that. If we can boycott something as stupid as a plastic straw then I will abstain from this disease-causing, home-destroying substance at all cost.

A lot of this information (like the fact that wine was diluted, and the fact that even table wine today was condemned in Scripture) is information lots of drinkers or those sympathetic to drinking have never heard. Shockingly, 64% of Protestants drink socially as do 81% of Catholics. Now that you have the facts, you and your congregation as a whole can make a decision to help lead loved ones away from alcohol. We are called to love one another, not condemn one another. And out of love, this is a basic case against the use of alcohol.